This document describes the standards for how we develop the Fuchsia IDK within the Platform Source Tree. Some of the information in this document might be of interest to clients of the Fuchsia SDK, but the primary focus of the document is how the Fuchsia project develops the SDK.
The contents of the Fuchsia IDK are governed by the Fuchsia API Council. The IDK does not contain libraries developed outside the Fuchsia project because those libraries are not subject to the governance of the Fuchsia API Council.
Client libraries in the IDK do not depend on libraries outside the IDK unless the external library has been approved by the Fuchsia API Council. Typically, the council will not approve a dependency unless the dependency has strict evolution criteria (e.g., the standard libraries for the various supported languages).
Example: Google Test
The Fuchsia IDK does not include the Google Test library because the governance for the Google Test library is provided by Google, not by the Fuchsia API Council.
The Fuchsia IDK does not depend on the Google Test library because the promises made by the governing body for the Google Test library are not compatible with the model used by the Fuchsia IDK.
Fuchsia System Interface
The Fuchsia System Interface is defined in Fuchsia System
Interface. Generally speaking, the binary interface to the system
is only the FIDL wireformat used by programs to communicate with the system and the syscalls exposed
FIDL Protocol Definitions
FIDL protocols are defined in
.fidl files, which are contained in the SDK.
All the FIDL definitions that have been published in an IDK should be considered
public ABI for the system. The system might also contain additional FIDL
definitions that have not been published in an IDK. Those definitions are
subject to change without notice and programs that rely upon their ABI might not
work properly in future versions of the system.
FIDL definitions in the IDK might evolve in source-incompatible ways. For
example, we might rename a method in a protocol while maintaining its ordinal
and semantics (the ordinal can be maintained by adding a
that is set to the original name). Such a change preserves the ABI but breaks
We do not currently have any standards about when we should break source compatibility.
Public FIDL definitions are located in the source tree under
The target name should be the name of the library.
FIDL definitions in the IDK should follow the FIDL API style rubric.
The Fuchsia IDK contains a number of "client libraries" (libraries that clients of an SDK integrating
the IDK can link into their programs). All of these client libraries are optional
and provided for the convenience ofclients, not for the convenience of the system.
The system must not rely upon programs using any specific client libraries.
libc is a client library (not a system library).
Stability and Packaging
Only the Fuchsia System Interface is ABI stable. Client libraries are neither API nor ABI stable. Binaries and libraries must be built against the same IDK version as the client libraries they are linked with.
All libraries a program links beyond the Fuchsia System Interface,
including client libraries, must be included inside the program's package. Dynamic libraries should
be placed in the
lib directory of the program's package.
Packages are the unit of software mobility, delivery, and linkage. Different packages can contain different versions of the same library. When running a program, the system provides that program the libraries from its own package, preventing the different libraries used by different packages from conflicting in the same program.
The Fuchsia IDK does not require clients to use a specific toolchain. For this reason, precompiled client libraries must have C linkage. For example, a precompiled client library cannot export C++ symbols because C++ does not have a standard ABI across toolchains (or even toolchain versions).
A client that takes a dependency on a client library must also take a dependency on all the dependencies of that library. For this reason, client libraries should have minimal dependencies. For example, client libraries should avoid dependencies on FBL, FXL, FSL, or other "base" libraries that are not in the SDK.
Client libraries that need to perform asynchronous operations should depend on
libasync-default.so. However, these libraries should not
assume the client is using any specific implementation of
For example, these libraries should not assume the
actually implemented by
libasync-loop.a. Libraries that require
async_get_default_dispatcher to be populated should state this requirement in
Precompiled libraries can have more extensive dependencies if those dependencies are hidden from their client. For example, a precompiled shared library should not export symbols from these dependencies and should not have headers that transitively include headers from these dependencies.
Client libraries should be named according to the language they expect their
clients to use.
For example, the C++ variant of the
$NAME library should be located in the
source tree under
The C variant should simply be under
Client libraries should follow the Fuchsia style guide for the language in which they are written.
Client libraries should avoid logging messages. Instead, client libraries should return errors to their clients, who can decide whether to log the error.
C and C++ client libraries should use
<zircon/assert.h>, to assert invariants. Client libraries may also use the
_MSG variants to provide a message when the assertion fails.
Recommendations for client code
The Fuchsia System Interface uses symbols with the
fuchsia_ prefixes and
preprocessor macros with the
FUCHSIA_ prefixes. To avoid collisions, these
prefixes are reserved for use by the Fuchsia IDK. Clients of the Fuchsia IDK should not
declare symbols or preprocessor macros with these prefixes.
The FIDL protocols included in the Fuchsia System Interface resides in the top-level
fuchsia namespace. To avoid collisions, this namespace is reserved for use by the
Fuchsia IDK. Clients of the Fuchsia IDK should not declare names in the top-level